Some have vague fears of immunizations in general. Some have fears based on experiences of others or stories they have heard in the news. Some have autism fears. Some have mercury fears. Some have “toxin fears”. Some are just frozen by the fear of the unknown.
Regardless of the spark, it is fear in the end that drives their thinking and decision making about immunizations and fear never drives rational thought. Trying to communicate the truth and provide sound information against such well entrenched fears, continually fueled by mistruths propagated by celebrities and celebrity doctors, is one of the biggest public health challenges of pediatrics today.
For this reason, pediatrician Paul Offit’s deconstructing of Dr. Bill Sears’ Vaccine Book in this month's Pediatrics is particularly important to the vaccine debate and spot on. Dr. V on Parenting Solved has a great post that goes through Dr. Offit's reasoning in full detail that I completely support, as do many other reputable health experts.
The big issue for me is the vaccine schedule and the need for physicians to be unified in how we approach parents about the schedule. The CDC schedule represents an entire community of doctors. It is essential that we present a united voice and approach on this very important issue of public health and vaccination. To do any less will cause harm because we will see resurgence in vaccine preventable diseases. To do any less is to disrespect an entire body of science and an entire think tank of doctors and scientists who have worked tirelessly for decades to come up with the currently approved schedule and who continue to work tirelessly to refine and modify that schedule as new science and advances in science comes to light.
It concerns me greatly that Dr. Sears feels he can be the lone voice in offering an alternative that was never vetted nor approved by our current think tanks of infections disease and pediatric experts. If he is truly “provaccination”, why bypass the system? Why not present his schedule to the system via appropriate channels and let the chips fall where they may? The answer is really very simple – it doesn’t stand the test of current immunization science and is not in the best interest of today’s children.
Comparing the number of shots and visits between the CDC schedule and Dr. Sears' alternative schedule is very telling. Here are the numbers for teen girls for the schedule with HPV:
- Dr. Sears: 20 office visits between ages 2months and 13 years for a total of 37 shots
- CDC: 13 office visits between birth and 13 years for a total of 34 shots
- Dr. Sears: 19 visits between ages 2months to 13 years for 34 shots
- CDC: 11 visits between birth and age 13 for 31 shots
Part of our job as pediatricians is to consider the big picture of their lives and respect their time in coming to the office. That is part of how we create trust. The other way we create trust is to assist each other in our own industry in ensuring the most accurate information is getting to all parents. If we do that, it will be much, much easier to immunize all children the proper way. We all too oaths to do no harm. To prove this to the families in crisis, we have to convince them that we are working as a team. Creating self-serving alternatives is not the solution.






4 comments:
I have to say I'm highly offended by this. As a parent who no longer vaccinates, reading that "fear never drives rational thought" was appalling. By your logic, the parents who become fearful when a child in their area dies of measles are being irrational by rushing to get their child vaccinated!!
I spent MONTHS researching my decision, and nothing you have to say to me will change my mind. I'd rather move out of the US than have my children vaccinated, which unfortunately seems possible...
Forgive my "disrespect" of science and doctors, but the real history of vaccines is shameful and morally reprehensible, not to mention dangerous to our bodies.
And while Dr Sears isn't my favorite because he still advocates vaccination in general, he at least gives parents the respect we deserve. WE care about our babies more than corporations and doctors ever could, and are the most responsible for them.
I suggest you think on that before insulting those parents who've expressed their freedom by refusing shots. We're not all mindless, irrational lemmings, I promise you!
You don't know everything. i vaccinate my son but i have no problem with people who do not vaccinate their children. They do and should have the right to choose how they will parents and what medical care they will receive. i don't get my son the pointless vaccines like the flu shot. i don't want to put any more dangerous chemicals in my son's body than i can help. I don't know if you what's in those vaccines but i don't how people feel great about injecting it into a 2 month old baby. You are a doctor and not much more- it doesn't make you a genius it just means you went to school
Boy, the antivaxers are a nasty bunch of know-it-alls, aren't they? It's really a striking demonstration of the "incompetent and unaware of it" phenomenon.
I love this:
"If he is truly “provaccination”, why bypass the system? Why not present his schedule to the system via appropriate channels and let the chips fall where they may?"
Excellent, excellent point.
I wouldn't mind "Dr. Bob" half as much if he didn't disingenuously insist that he's trying to make people more comfortable with vaccination. By telling them it's so dangerous it has to be done His Way.
A Mom to Dr. Gwen: Those Who Question the Current Vaccination Schedule Are Not Afraid
I appreciate the acknowledgement that most vaccine-resisting parents seem highly educated and well mannered. I believe you will find this to be a very common characteristic of not an over protective parent like you describe, but a concerned parent whose study and research of vaccinations has extended beyond the basic guidelines issued by the CDC. I am saddened, however, at your implication that parents who wish to protect their children from unnecessary harm are expecting too much from sound science. Sound science, you argue, is responsible for the best immunization schedule. However, this schedule and it's safety for infants and children can not be, you say, supported by the very sound science that created it.
I am not afraid. I do not harbor general fears, nor do I fear media, word of mouth, autism, mercury, or toxins. I am concerned about general effectiveness, adequate immunities, and expecting too much from a child's body. 1 2 3 4
My thoughts are not irrationally driven by fear because I do not fear. What then, could be the cause of difficulty in trying to communicate to me what you view as sound and accurate information? Surely you don't believe that a “pleasant and well spoken... highly educated and well read”5 person is going to have made her decisions based on actual mistruths and celebrities, do you? I do not doubt the following of celebrity doctors. My decision making is driven by my desire to make the best possible decisions I can about my child's health, and are based primarily on documents created by the CDC as well as statements from vaccine manufacturer representatives.
I understand the need for approaching parents in a unified manner, and generally, I whole heartedly agree. A unified approach can help parents feel confident in pediatricians as a whole and can eliminate variables that leave them open for discretization. I mean no disrespect to the endlessly working think tank at the CDC, but the idea that vaccine preventable diseases will resurge with out vaccinations is not wholly true, and is primarily a scare tactic than scientifically proved fact.
While certainly manipulated to support your argument, your presentation of the alternative vaccination schedule created by Dr. Sears is misleading. While you claim that it “can not stand the test of immunization science and is not in the best interest of today's children”, the spacing of these vaccines does comply with the current guidelines for re-dosing vaccines. All follow up doses of vaccines are given with in the appropriate time frame from their previous doses, and all vaccines are given. If the goal of the CDC is to encourage vaccination and (hopefully) full immunity, these results are achieved through Dr. Sears's schedule.
I am disappointed that your primary support for discrediting Dr. Sears's alternative schedule is a misrepresentation of facts. Your facts about numbers of visits and shots is not nearly as telling as suggested. Dr. Sears's alternative schedule does in deed require more office visits and more individual shots, but does not result in more vaccinations. I appreciate your appeal to my time and finances, but, as a mom, my primary concern is with ensuring I make the best decisions for my child's health, not for my clock or pocket book. To suggest that “Dr. Sears' (sic) isn't sparing children any pain or harm by his schedule one iota” is utterly false. As a doctor and a scientist, I know you know better than to compare assumed perceptions of hypothetical children with scientifically researched and based vaccination alternatives, even if you don't agree.
I am encouraged by your acknowledgement of time and trust between parents and doctors, as well as your dedication to ensuring parents receive the most accurate information. Accurate information, however, does not come solely from one authoritative source (in our case the CDC). Yes, you have taken an oath to do no harm. It is because of that oath that I encourage you to look beyond the standard issued by the CDC and search for the best possible option for a child's health rather than accepting as unquestioned fact that of the CDC. Don't toss aside challengers and alternative perspectives. Use them as valuable resources for study. Gain from them new knowledge you can use to make the best health decisions for my child. Please, do not approach me, or any other “pleasant and well spoken... highly educated and well read” person and tell me that the current recommended vaccination schedule is correct because the CDC says so, and please, never tell a parent who is spending what little free time he/she has searching for the ideal way to care for his/her children that any deviation from the CDC is self-serving.
1. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/vac-admin/contraindications.htm
2. MMWR Vol. 43/ No. RR-1 1-28-94
3. MMWR Vol. 40/ No. RR-13
4. The Congressional Quartely, August 25, 2000. 647.
5. http://pediatricsnow.blogspot.com/2009/01/offit-to-sears-current-vaccine-schedule.html
Post a Comment